December 26, 2011

Definition of Public Servant & Penalty under Prevention of corruption Act 1988 and what extended in Lokpal Bill-2011

In the tabled  Lokpal Bill in the parliament, the government has proposed the  following changes in the definition of public servant and has proposed the forfeiture of the property of corrupt official once he is arrested red handed or if Lokpal think so and the punishments have been extended :

 The earlier definition of Public Servant as given under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988:

2.1 The definition of public servant has been enlarged so as to include
the office-bearers of the registered co-operative societies receiving any
financial aid from the government, of from a Government Corporation/
Company, the employees of universities, Public Service Commissions,
and Banks etc. Section 2 (c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988,
defines the public servant as under:-

i) Any person in the service or pay of the Government or remunerated
by the Government by fees or commission for
the performance of any public duty;

ii) Any person in the service or pay of a local authority;

iii) Any person in the service or pay of a corporation established
by or under a Central, Provincial or State Act, or an
authority or a body owned or controlled or aided by the
Government or a Government company as defined in section
617 of the Companies Act, 1956;

iv) Any judge, including any person empowered by law to discharge,
whether by himself or as a member of any body of
persons, any adjudicator functions;
v) Any person authorised by a court of justice to perform any
duty, in connection with the administration of justice, including
a liquidator, receiver of commissioner appointed
by such court;
vi) Any arbitrator or other person to whom any cause or matter
has been referred for decision or report by a court of
justice or by a competent public authority;
vii) Any person who holds an office by virtue of which he is
empowered to prepare, publish, maintain or revise an electoral
roll or to conduct an election or part of an election;
viii) Any person who holds an office by virtue of which he is
authorised or required to perform any public duty;
ix) Any person who is the president, secretary or other office-
bearer of a registered co-operative society engaged
in agriculture, industry, trade or banking, receiving or
having received any financial aid from the Central Government
or a State Government or from any corporation
established by or under a Central, Provincial or State
Act, or any authority or body owned or controlled or
aided by the Government or a Government company as
defined in section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956;
x) Any person who is a chairman, member of employee of
any Service Commission or Board, by whatever name
called, or a member of any selection committee appointed
by such Commission or Board for the conduct of any
examination or making any selection on behalf of such
Commission or Board;
xi) Any person who is a vice-chancellor or member of any
governing body, professor, reader, lecturer or any other
teacher or employee, by whatever designation called, of
any University and any person whose services have been
availed of by a University or any other public authority
in connection with holding or conducting examinations;
xii) Any person who is an office-bearer or an employee of an
educational, scientific, social, cultural or other institution,
in whatever manner established, receiving or having
received any financial assistance from the Central
Government or any State Government, or local or other
public authority;
Explanation 1 - Persons falling under any of the above sub-clauses
are public servants, whether appointed by the Government or not.
Explanation 2 - wherever the words .Public Servant occur, they
shall be understood of every person who is in actual possession of the
situation of a public servant, whatever legal defect there may be in his
right to hold that situation.

The following person or body have been added as public servant besides as given in Prevention of Curuption Act

(g) any person who is or has been a director, manager, secretary or other officer
of every other society or association of persons or trust (whether registered under
any law for the time being in force or not) in receipt of any donation from the public and
the annual income of which exceeds such amount as the State Government may by
notification specify or from any foreign source under the Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act, 2010 in excess of ten lakh rupees in a year or such higher amount as
the Central Government may by notification specify;

Explanation.—For the purpose of clauses (f) and (g), it is herby clarified that any
entity or institution, by whatever name called, corporate, society, trust, association of persons,
partnership, sole proprietorship, limited liability partnership (whether registered under any
law for the time being in force or not), shall be the entities covered in those clauses:
Provided that any person referred to in this clause shall be deemed to be a public
servant under clause (c) of section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the
provisions of that Act shall apply accordingly:

(f) any person who is or has been a director, manager, secretary or other officer
of every other society or association of persons or trust (whether registered under
any law for the time being in force or not), by whatever name called, wholly or partly
financed or aided by the State Government and the annual income of which exceeds
such amount as the State Government may by notification specify;

BIGGEST CHANGE IN LOKPAL BILL : So far investing gating authority including CBI
 had to take prior permission from ministry against A&B officers(IAS, IPS, IFS, IRS, IRS etc)
 or above under secretary under section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
or section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 or section 19 of
the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 but in lokpal, no such prior permission is
 required for any proceeding against any public servant if Lokpal receives any complaint.

3. Punishment and Penalty to Public Servants :
_________________________________________________________________


3.1.1 Section 7 of the PC Act, 1988, corresponds to repealed Section
161 IPC with the modification that the minimum punishment has
been prescribed as imprisonment of six months and the maximum punishment
has been increased from three years to five years. The relevant
section is reproduced below:-
3.1.1(d) The State Government or as the case may be, the Central Government
has now the power to make an application to the District
Judge for the attachment of the money or property which
is believed to have been acquired by the public servant by corrupt
means;
New provision have been added in Lokpal Bill for forfeiture of property of Accused
90. (1) Where the Lokayukta or any investigation officer authorised by it in this behalf,
has reason to believe, the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing, on the basis of
material in his possession, that—
(a) any person is in possession of any proceeds of corruption;
(b) such person is accused of having committed an offence relating to corruption;
And

(c) such proceeds of offence are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with
in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation
of such proceeds of offence, he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such
property for a period not exceeding ninety days from the date of the order, in the
manner provided in the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Lokayukta
shall be deemed to be an officer under sub-rule (e) of rule 1 of that Schedule.

(2) The Lokayukta shall, immediately after attachment under sub-section (1), forward
a copy of the order, along with the material in his possession, referred to in that sub-section,
to the Special Court, in a sealed envelope, in the manner as may be prescribed and such Court
may extend the order of attachment and keep such material for such period as the Court may
deem fit.

(3) Every order of attachment made under sub-section (1) shall cease to have effect
after the expiry of the period specified in that sub-section or after the expiry of the period as
directed by the Special Court under sub-section (2).

(4) Nothing in this section shall prevent the person interested in the enjoyment of the
immovable property attached under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), from such enjoyment.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, "person interested", in relation
to any immovable property, includes all persons claiming or entitled to claim any interest in
the property.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988
(49 OF 1988)
1. In sections 7, 8, 9 and section 12,—
(a) for the words "six months", the words "three years" shall respectively be
substituted;
(b) for the words "five years", the words "seven years" shall respectively be
substituted;
2. In section 13, in sub-section (2), —
(a) for the words "one year", the words "four years" shall be substituted;
(b) for the words "seven years", the words "ten years" shall be substituted;
3. In section 14,—
(a) for the words "two years", the words "five years" shall be substituted.
(b) for the words "seven years", the words "ten years" shall be substituted.
4. In section 15, for the words "which may extend to three years", the words "which
shall not be less than two years but which may extend to five years" shall be substituted.
5. In section 19, after the words "except with the previous sanction", the words "save
as otherwise provided in the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2011" shall be inserted.

December 25, 2011

ANNA AND HIS TEAM A PATIENT OF SOLIPSISM


ANNA HAZARE
             This is the universal fact that at last the government under duress from "Civil Society" has tabled the amended Lokpal bill with stringent punishment of forfeiture of  corrupt employees all property once he is arrested even before delivery of judgement.

Solipsism means : " A theory holding that the others can know nothing but its own modifications and that the self is the only existent thing; also : extreme ego centrism"or I am only right rest are fool.

 With dismay, the team Anna reaction to tabled bill appears to be curing of parliamentary system of India-which we could got  and set up after continuous 200 years struggle and sacrifices-  rather than crusades against corruption.The agitation against corruption left with no relevance after tabling of bill in parliament and has become fun and source of enjoyment for Anna, kejriwal, Kiran Bedi and his rest of team .

Yesterday in parliament, though, all politicians  of different parties in their speeches denied that we were not bowing before the pressure of Civil society but the fact is that the LokPal Bill was hanging in parliament for the last 43 year in the parliament to take shape of an act to be effective to check the menace of corruption going through bottom to top. 

Still one’s not sure about the free passage of bill keeping in mind the past history and hanging fate of the Lokpal bill though both the congress and BJP have issued whip to its members to be present in the parliament at the time of voting on the bill.

Anna and its team members have rejected the draft of tabled lokpal boll calling it  “Teen ka Dibba” and speeches of MPs were  termed as full of arrogant. The question arises to comment on the speeches of members in the parliament is not encroachment on the rights of elected members. Every Indian is though free to express their views on or against the tabled bill or on any conscientious matter but should make joke of parliament.
The attitude of  Anna and his  team is very rude and indecent in the system of parliament which demeans its importance in democracy. Because in democracy, the one and only one platform where the grievances of the countrymen can be raised and discussed is in parliament. To scoff at the parliament be punishable under law-you have right to raise grievances and solution.


Yesterday, when parliament was going on , one tweet was given by @Janlokpal making scoff off prime minister posture which is very objectionable. Prime minister is the supreme authority of India for execution and welfare of 1200millions Indians. The misbehaviour of Anna team has been  becoming a nuisance for democracy and we may term their behaviours which smell fascism -when you compel and strangulate the elected members with the guns of media powers to accept their dictate otherwise we shall disturb the whole peace of country.  

By continuously cursing the elected members,  Anna is loosing popularity due to  his outspoken speeches and need to be dealt severely for smooth functioning of parliamentarian system in our country. If we respect civil society so we must respect elected members.

If Anna and his team feel that  elected members are not  coming to its contour than they must float its own party in the country, contest election, and form its own government to pass the desired bills in the parliament to curb the corruption, inflation, unemployment, uncleanliness etc etc from the tiny roots  but please trust in parliamentarian system so long if you are not elected members in Indian democracy otherwise we may call your arrogance , insistence, disobedience  and  your team a patient of solipsism.